-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
podman search: --list-tags clobbers --format #8740
Comments
Hi, I am using podman 2.1.1. When I run command |
Looks like this did not show up until podman-2.2, which should be available now. |
Hello, This output following the same structure of the default option of the {
"Index": "",
"Name": "docker.io/library/redis",
"Description": "",
"Stars": 0,
"Official": "",
"Automated": "",
"Tag": "2.8.7"
} Or this output following the structure of the {
"Name": "docker.io/library/redis",
"Tag": "2.8.7"
} Thank you for your time and your work. |
That's a really good question. My first reaction was to go with your first option (populate {
"Name": "docker.io/library/redis",
"Tags": ["2-32bit", "2.6-32bit", "2.6.17-32bit", "2.6.17", "2.6", "..."]
}
I haven't even peeked at the code, and don't know how easy/hard that would be; nor do I know if this would violate API conventions. @rhatdan @mheon @jwhonce @TomSweeneyRedHat @baude WDYT? |
If it does not violate any conventions, Your suggestion seems better. For me, the implementation looks feasible. It looks like it could be fixed in this file. I will implement your output format, and when the community validates that it follows all necessary conventions, I will make a pull request. If it sounds right to you. |
command. Data is formatted following this JSON structure: ```json { "Name": "...", "Tags": ["...", "...", "..."] } ``` Closes: containers#8740. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Fourcat <[email protected]>
podman search --list-tags
will output a table, even if--format
is requested (eitherjson
or{{.Tag}}
):If possible, the requested
--format
should be honored. If not possible, there should be a run-time check throwing a conflicting-options error.Related: #8276
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: