-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Drop [Install] section from podman.service #7190
Labels
kind/bug
Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug.
kind/feature
Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
locked - please file new issue/PR
Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Comments
martinpitt
added a commit
to martinpitt/cockpit-podman
that referenced
this issue
Aug 3, 2020
2.0.3 breaks API: - https://bugs.debian.org/966501 - containers/podman#7078 The Debian package now ships the REST systemd units, but due to containers/podman#7190 they get "over-enabled". Hack around that.
1 task
martinpitt
added a commit
to martinpitt/cockpit-podman
that referenced
this issue
Aug 3, 2020
2.0.3 breaks API: - https://bugs.debian.org/966501 - containers/podman#7078 The Debian package now ships the REST systemd units, but due to containers/podman#7190 they get "over-enabled". Hack around that.
marusak
pushed a commit
to cockpit-project/cockpit-podman
that referenced
this issue
Aug 3, 2020
2.0.3 breaks API: - https://bugs.debian.org/966501 - containers/podman#7078 The Debian package now ships the REST systemd units, but due to containers/podman#7190 they get "over-enabled". Hack around that.
Thanks for the report. I'll open a PR in a minute. |
vrothberg
added a commit
to vrothberg/libpod
that referenced
this issue
Aug 3, 2020
podman.service is socket activated through podman.socket. It should not have its own [Install] section, it does not make sense to systemctl enable podman.service. This leads to podman.service always running on a Debian system, as Debian's policy is to enable/start running services by default. We don't want a daemon :^) Fixes: containers#7190 Reported-by: @martinpitt Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
vrothberg
added a commit
to vrothberg/libpod
that referenced
this issue
Aug 11, 2020
podman.service is socket activated through podman.socket. It should not have its own [Install] section, it does not make sense to systemctl enable podman.service. This leads to podman.service always running on a Debian system, as Debian's policy is to enable/start running services by default. We don't want a daemon :^) Fixes: containers#7190 Reported-by: @martinpitt Signed-off-by: Valentin Rothberg <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
kind/bug
Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug.
kind/feature
Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.
locked - please file new issue/PR
Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
/kind bug
/kind feature
Description
podman.service
is socket activated throughpodman.socket
. It should not have its own[Install]
section, it does not make sense tosystemctl enable podman.service
. This is defined here.This leads to podman.service always running on a Debian system, as Debian's policy is to enable/start running services by default.
Can you please drop this?
Output of
podman version
:Package info (e.g. output of
rpm -q podman
orapt list podman
):The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: