-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
podman-remote wait: fails with read /proc/N/cgroup: no such process #16383
Labels
flakes
Flakes from Continuous Integration
locked - please file new issue/PR
Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Comments
edsantiago
added
flakes
Flakes from Continuous Integration
remote
Problem is in podman-remote
labels
Nov 2, 2022
Another one, also remote, but f37 this time instead of f36
|
@giuseppe, any idea what could cause it? |
it is a race when reading the process cgroup using What happens is that the process terminates between the open("/proc/$PID/cgroup") succeded and the following read. It can be easily reproduced with:
|
giuseppe
added a commit
to giuseppe/libpod
that referenced
this issue
Nov 14, 2022
when reading from the /proc/$PID/cgroup file, treat ESRCH in the same way as ENOENT since the kernel returns ESRCH if the file was opened correctly but the target process exited before the open could be performed. Closes: containers#16383 [NO NEW TESTS NEEDED] it is a race condition that is difficult to reproduce. Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
PR here: #16504 |
github-actions
bot
added
the
locked - please file new issue/PR
Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
label
Sep 10, 2023
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Labels
flakes
Flakes from Continuous Integration
locked - please file new issue/PR
Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Seen just now in remote f36-aarch64 root. Almost certainly a flake:
My flake logs find one other instance, September 14 in f36 rootless, but that one is preceded by other errors. This one, no prior indications of failure.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: