Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fedora gating test failure: 312 sdnotify : play kube - with policies #16246

Closed
lsm5 opened this issue Oct 21, 2022 · 10 comments
Closed

Fedora gating test failure: 312 sdnotify : play kube - with policies #16246

lsm5 opened this issue Oct 21, 2022 · 10 comments
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.

Comments

@lsm5
Copy link
Member

lsm5 commented Oct 21, 2022

Is this a BUG REPORT or FEATURE REQUEST? (leave only one on its own line)

/kind bug

Description

not ok 312 sdnotify : play kube - with policies
# (from function `run_podman' in file ./helpers.bash, line 207,
#  in test file ./260-sdnotify.bats, line 341)
#   `run_podman container wait $container_a' failed
# # /usr/bin/podman rm -t 0 --all --force --ignore
# # /usr/bin/podman ps --all --external --format {{.ID}} {{.Names}}
# # /usr/bin/podman images --all --format {{.Repository}}:{{.Tag}} {{.ID}}
# quay.io/libpod/testimage:20220615 f26aa69bb3f3
# # /usr/bin/podman pull quay.io/libpod/fedora:31
# Trying to pull quay.io/libpod/fedora:31...
# Getting image source signatures
# Copying blob sha256:c28ace6b0c4ae099f6f81091731bdf41d9771d28bad96ae4a3507fe950560930
# Copying config sha256:a7a37f74ff864eec55891b64ad360d07020827486e30a92ea81d16459645b26a
# Writing manifest to image destination
# Storing signatures
# a7a37f74ff864eec55891b64ad360d07020827486e30a92ea81d16459645b26a
# # /usr/bin/podman container wait test_pod-a test_pod-b --condition=running
# Error: no container with name or ID "test_pod-a" found: no such container
# [ rc=125 ]
# # /usr/bin/podman ps -a
# CONTAINER ID  IMAGE       COMMAND     CREATED     STATUS      PORTS       NAMES
# # /usr/bin/podman container wait test_pod-a test_pod-b --condition=running
# Error: no container with name or ID "test_pod-a" found: no such container
# [ rc=125 ]
# # /usr/bin/podman ps -a
# CONTAINER ID  IMAGE                                    COMMAND     CREATED                 STATUS      PORTS       NAMES
# 0de3cb821f7e  localhost/podman-pause:4.3.0-1666271887              Less than a second ago  Created                 9cffc8377ee1-service
# 28bbe47814aa  localhost/podman-pause:4.3.0-1666271887              Less than a second ago  Created                 a43fed04129e-infra
# 68831fd785b8  quay.io/libpod/fedora:31                             Less than a second ago  Created                 test_pod-a
# # /usr/bin/podman container wait test_pod-a test_pod-b --condition=running
# -1
# -1
# # /usr/bin/podman container inspect test_pod-a test_pod-b 9cffc8377ee1-service --format {{.Config.SdNotifyMode}}
# container
# conmon
# ignore
# # /usr/bin/podman container inspect test_pod-a --format {{.Config.SdNotifySocket}}
# /var/tmp/-podman-notify-proxy.sock3209409983
# # /usr/bin/podman logs test_pod-a
# /run/notify/notify.sock
# READY
# # /usr/bin/podman exec test_pod-a /bin/touch /stop
# # /usr/bin/podman container inspect 9cffc8377ee1-service --format {{.State.ConmonPid}}
# 139810
# # /usr/bin/podman container wait test_pod-a
# timeout: sending signal TERM to command ‘/usr/bin/podman’
# [ rc=124 (** EXPECTED 0 **) ]
# *** TIMED OUT ***
# # [teardown]
# # /usr/bin/podman pod rm -t 0 --all --force --ignore
# a43fed04129ef695d2e4fb2db4ed61e529e47c47585b8c3a83fce65b65f424c8
# # /usr/bin/podman rm -t 0 --all --force --ignore
# # /usr/bin/podman network prune --force
# podman-default-kube-network
# setup(): removing stray image localhost/podman-pause:4.3.0-1666271887
# setup(): removing stray image dd795a4eb195
# setup(): removing stray image quay.io/libpod/fedora:31
# setup(): removing stray image a7a37f74ff86

Steps to reproduce the issue:

  1. Fedora gating tests

Package info (e.g. output of rpm -q podman or apt list podman or brew info podman):

4.3.0-2
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Oct 21, 2022
@lsm5
Copy link
Member Author

lsm5 commented Oct 21, 2022

@edsantiago PTAL

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

This is #16076, which was should've been fixed a week ago in #16118. @vrothberg PTAL. @lsm5 please confirm that this is 4.3, not something old.

@lsm5
Copy link
Member Author

lsm5 commented Oct 21, 2022

This is #16076, which was should've been fixed a week ago in #16118. @vrothberg PTAL. @lsm5 please confirm that this is 4.3, not something old.

It's the latest v4.3.0 on rawhide https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-48156b03b5

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member

This is #16076, which was should've been fixed a week ago in #16118. @vrothberg PTAL. @lsm5 please confirm that this is 4.3, not something old.

The "fix" is part of v4.3.0 but apparently not sufficient. Any chance we can restart gating tests?

Did we see the test flake in rawhide before?

@lsm5
Copy link
Member Author

lsm5 commented Oct 21, 2022

The "fix" is part of v4.3.0 but apparently not sufficient. Any chance we can restart gating tests?

Did we see the test flake in rawhide before?

before meaning before v4.3.0 or on a prior test run with v4.3.0 ? Maybe @edsantiago remembers better.

@lsm5
Copy link
Member Author

lsm5 commented Oct 21, 2022

rerunning gating test now

@vrothberg
Copy link
Member

before meaning before v4.3.0 or on a prior test run with v4.3.0 ? Maybe @edsantiago remembers better.

In general. Any previous of version of Podman but this test.

@lsm5
Copy link
Member Author

lsm5 commented Oct 21, 2022

In general. Any previous of version of Podman but this test.

ack, no recollection. I'll leave it to Ed.

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

There is no mechanism (push nor pull) for me to know of Fedora gating-test results, so I can neither monitor them nor save logs. I'm sorry, I have no idea what the history of this flake is. Since @vrothberg just fixed it a week ago in main, I think the important consideration is that the fix in #16118 may not be sufficient.

@edsantiago
Copy link
Member

Closing as dup of #16076.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Sep 12, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 12, 2023
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants