vendor: update containers/storage #846
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Change LGTM, just wondering if we should hold until containers/image#472 merges.
|
@TomSweeneyRedHat this changes only containers/storage not containers/image. I am wondering more about: containers/storage#137 that I'd like to include as well in our tools 😄 |
|
DOH! You're right, I must be having too much July 4th fun. A straight LGTM then. |
|
@giuseppe I merged the OSTree support, so update to pull that in. |
giuseppe
force-pushed
the
vndr-storage
branch
3 times, most recently
from
a217b50 to
179782c
Compare
Update to version 9cbb6cb3fc2044eae8b8fd8d8da081fe812858c4 Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <[email protected]>
|
@rhatdan done ⬆️ |
|
📌 Commit 7c701e5 has been approved by |
|
☀️ Test successful - status-papr |
|
@giuseppe Could you write up a couple of blogs on why these versions of container/storage are important and useful. |
|
yes, I'll do that. In the last days I've done a lot of improvements in https://github.com/giuseppe/containerfs and solved all the design issues I didn't like. I think it is in a good shape for a tech preview. |
Update to version 58f557cf12df3e11437485f329c15b5c20bebb90
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano [email protected]