netavark_cache_groom.sh: fix wrong branch #510
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
As this download from the netavark repo is should use the NETAVARK_BRANCH env. Signed-off-by: Paul Holzinger <[email protected]>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
Tests failed. @containers/packit-build please check. |
|
LGTM |
|
/lgtm |
openshift-merge-bot
bot
merged commit bf6e536
into
containers:main
37 of 47 checks passed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As this download from the netavark repo is should use the NETAVARK_BRANCH env.
Porting from #507, not failing on main as both branches are set to main here anyway but in case we have a async branch setup in the future again we need this