doc: should use master tag for binfmt #2823
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Wei Zhang <[email protected]>
cc @tonistiigi |
|
hi @AkihiroSuda, from tonistiigi/binfmt#165 (comment), it looks like the latest is not updated on purpose for historical reasons, what should we do for this one? should we document it to use the master tag, or the versioned one? it may not be a good choice to use the legacy tag latest, WDYT? |
AkihiroSuda
approved these changes
May 5, 2024
|
Let's merge this, but we may revert this later |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
the latest tag for binfmt was updated 2 years ago, users should use the master tag which is updated regularly.