Add recipe for code-server

[xhochy]

Fixes #10202

Checklist

• License file is packaged (see here for an example)
• Source is from official source
• Package does not vendor other packages. (If a package uses the source of another package, they should be separate packages or the licenses of all packages need to be packaged)
• If static libraries are linked in, the license of the static library is packaged.
• Build number is 0
• A tarball (url) rather than a repo (e.g. git_url) is used in your recipe (see here for more details)
• GitHub users listed in the maintainer section have posted a comment confirming they are willing to be listed there

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/code-server) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipes/code-server:

• When defining a source/url please add a sha256, sha1 or md5 checksum (sha256 preferably).

[conda-forge-linter]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipes/code-server) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[jan-janssen]

It has to be code-server${VERSION}

[jan-janssen]

[binary] Binary: $SRC_DIR/binaries/code-server2.1692-vsc1.39.2-darwin-x86_64
Done in 8.27s.

So it has to be code-server${VERSION} instead of code${VERSION} or code-${VERSION}

[xhochy]

🤦‍♂ Oh, sorry. Was too early for me.

[jan-janssen]

Maybe it should be mv binaries/code-server${VERSION}-*-x86_64 ${PREFIX}/bin/code-server instead, so the executable always has the name code-server, which is required for the tests.

[xhochy]

Yes. I'm sadly not able to test this locally as the recipe won't build for me on OSX due to conda-forge/git-feedstock#50 (which is not happening in CI). I therefore run the steps without conda-build and copied the necessary commands over here. The last two lines are the untested ones :(

[xhochy]

This repackages node from a different source via https://github.com/cdr/nbin, we need to get rid of that as the binary is built on a too new system.

[xhochy]

@conda-forge/staged-recipes This is ready for review.

[xhochy]

This bundles VSCode inside the package but I hope that is acceptable. The VSCode installation is not separable at the current stage as it lands all in one binary.

[xhochy]

@conda-forge/staged-recipes Please give this a a review/merge :)

[isuruf]

Looks good to me, but if some packages are statically linked in the final binary, the licenses of the dependencies have to be packaged.

[xhochy]

@isuruf Added VSCode license and third-party notices.