Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use noarch syntax to simplify build matrix #177

Conversation

conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I've started rerendering the recipe as instructed in #176.

If I find any needed changes to the recipe, I'll push them to this PR shortly. Thank you for waiting!

Here's a checklist to do before merging.

  • Bump the build number if needed.

@conda-forge-webservices
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@conda-forge-webservices
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found some lint.

Here's what I've got...

For recipe:

  • Non noarch packages should have python requirement without any version constraints.
  • Non noarch packages should have python requirement without any version constraints.

@conda-forge-webservices
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@hmaarrfk
Copy link
Contributor

@conda-forge-admin please rerender

@hmaarrfk hmaarrfk changed the title MNT: rerender Use noarch syntax to simplify build matrix Jun 22, 2024
@hmaarrfk hmaarrfk force-pushed the conda_forge_admin_176 branch from 224639e to 186e862 Compare June 22, 2024 17:36
@hmaarrfk
Copy link
Contributor

@conda-forge-admin please rerender

@ccordoba12
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @hmaarrfk, thanks for your help with this and sorry for the long delay in replying.

We were quite busy preparing Spyder 6.0 and, since our new installers for that version onwards are based in Conda-forge, we didn't want to touch our feedstock in any significant way until the final release.

But now that that's done, I think we can revisit this work, which will help to build our installers much faster (and reduce Conda-forge resource usage too, of course).

I'll open a new PR with the changes you did here to our recipe because this one is outdated now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants