Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

1.13.1 osx only #158

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

1.13.1 osx only #158

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

ngam
Copy link
Contributor

@ngam ngam commented Jan 14, 2023

Checklist

  • Used a personal fork of the feedstock to propose changes
  • Bumped the build number (if the version is unchanged)
  • Reset the build number to 0 (if the version changed)
  • Re-rendered with the latest conda-smithy (Use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerender in a comment in this PR for automated rerendering)
  • Ensured the license file is being packaged.

@conda-forge-webservices
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

@hmaarrfk
Copy link
Contributor

I think this may be the cause conda-forge/python-feedstock#597

do yo uwant to try forcing build 0?

@hmaarrfk
Copy link
Contributor

it could be that we need conda-forge/crossenv-feedstock#38 (review)

@ngam
Copy link
Contributor Author

ngam commented Jan 15, 2023

I am in no hurry. (Also, I will likely be away-ish for a bit, on the order of ~1 week.)

Do you know how to force the python build to 0 here? I am asking because the python version gets inherited somewhere in the process and I am not sure if adding =*=*_0 or something else will do the trick...

@ngam
Copy link
Contributor Author

ngam commented Jan 15, 2023

Ok thanks; btw, I tried using the py==310 for skip, i.e. skip: true # [py==310], and it didn't work... 😢

@hmaarrfk
Copy link
Contributor

yeah... sometimes skipping is weird.

@hmaarrfk
Copy link
Contributor

did it get further?

@ngam
Copy link
Contributor Author

ngam commented Jan 15, 2023

Yes, looks like it is getting further!

@ngam
Copy link
Contributor Author

ngam commented Jan 15, 2023

Thank you, good job!!

@hmaarrfk
Copy link
Contributor

@conda-forge-admin please rerender

@github-actions
Copy link

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-webservice.

I tried to rerender for you, but it looks like there was nothing to do.

This message was generated by GitHub actions workflow run https://github.com/conda-forge/pytorch-cpu-feedstock/actions/runs/3923246416.

@hmaarrfk hmaarrfk closed this Jan 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants