[main] Rebuild for aws_crt_cpp0201, google_cloud_cpp2101, re220230302

[regro-cf-autotick-bot]

This PR has been triggered in an effort to update aws_crt_cpp0201.

Notes and instructions for merging this PR:

1. Please merge the PR only after the tests have passed.
2. Feel free to push to the bot's branch to update this PR if needed.

Please note that if you close this PR we presume that the feedstock has been rebuilt, so if you are going to perform the rebuild yourself don't close this PR until the your rebuild has been merged.

Closes #1059

If this PR was opened in error or needs to be updated please add the bot-rerun label to this PR. The bot will close this PR and schedule another one. If you do not have permissions to add this label, you can use the phrase @conda-forge-admin, please rerun bot in a PR comment to have the conda-forge-admin add it for you.

_{This PR was created by the regro-cf-autotick-bot. The regro-cf-autotick-bot is a service to automatically track the dependency graph, migrate packages, and propose package version updates for conda-forge. Feel free to drop us a line if there are any issues! This PR was generated by https://github.com/regro/cf-scripts/actions/runs/4970484114, please use this URL for debugging.}

[conda-forge-webservices]

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR (recipe) and found it was in an excellent condition.

[h-vetinari]

Let's wait with this round of PRs this until we figured out the abseil situation a bit better all sorted now

[h-vetinari]

Single test failure here, and only on linux. Normally I'd go with a skip, but this looks like it might be leaking memory? Any ideas? The test in question has no comments or documentation AFAICS.
@kou @pitrou @jorisvandenbossche @xhochy

=================================== FAILURES ===================================
__________________________ test_total_bytes_allocated __________________________

    def test_total_bytes_allocated():
>       assert pa.total_allocated_bytes() == 0
E       assert 1216 == 0
E        +  where 1216 = <built-in function total_allocated_bytes>()
E        +    where <built-in function total_allocated_bytes> = pa.total_allocated_bytes

It's also interesting that this doesn't appear in any of the equivalent PRs to the maintenance branches, e.g. #1057.

[xhochy]

This is a test that shouldn't be flaky. It would be good if someone from upstream can look into it or we can hope that with updated dependencies, it also shows up upstream.

[h-vetinari]

we can hope that with updated dependencies, it also shows up upstream.

Checking this in apache/arrow#35637

[h-vetinari]

we can hope that with updated dependencies, it also shows up upstream.

Checking this in apache/arrow#35637

Does not reproduce with current upstream main branch...