Fix #2886: include package names in the haddock index. #3226
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
It turned out that Haddock expects to see packages with those names in the GHC package DB, and omits the names otherwise. Pointing Haddock to the local and snapshot DBs resolved the issue.
|
Thank you! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It turned out that Haddock expects to see packages with those names
in the GHC package DB, and omits the names otherwise. Pointing
Haddock to the local and snapshot DBs resolved the issue.
Tested by running "stack haddock" for a local package and verifying that all the generated
index.htmlfiles (local packages, local packages and deps, snapshot packages) list the package name for each module.