Bug fix for non-checksummed address #91
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
milan-cb
requested review from
alex-stone,
jazz-cb and
rohan-agarwal-coinbase
milan-cb
changed the title
rohan-agarwal-coinbase
previously approved these changes
Jan 24, 2025
🟡 Heimdall Review Status
|
rohan-agarwal-coinbase
approved these changes
Jan 24, 2025
milan-cb
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2025
* Bug fix for non-checksummed address (#91) * chore: fixed casing error for assetids * updated changelog * edited changelog to unreleased * chore: added USDC gasless transfer e2e test (#92) * chore: added USDC gasless transfer e2e test * unset dev configuration for sdk * updated CHANGELOG * Milan/v0.16.0 release prep (#93) * skipped gasless transfer test * chore: bumped version to v0.16.0
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed? Why?
There was a bug in the from_model function in asset.py. On the backend side, any asset id is checksummed before retrieving its details, and when it returns a response to the SDK, its asset id is also checksummed. When a user enters a non-checksummed address, they will get an error since those two asset ids are not equivalent.
This change will allow users to use non-checksummed addresses without getting erroneous errors in their workflow.
Before:
Now:
Qualified Impact
This change should not be a breaking change for the SDK. The same logic of the check for asset ids exists, but with the normalization of cases, it prevents the bug of non-checksummed addresses and checksummed addresses being considered as unequal.