-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor #14
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Since I made this original pull request, there has been a complete rewrite of the Unfortunately, this has come with a slight change in behaviour:
Could someone please have a look at my new implementation? |
I had a look. I've added some json outputs from both version and compared using sorted DataFrames. I can confirm that the 2 versions give the same results. Except the original code did not find the zero-transitions in the last row and column of the data. This is because it looped on range(0, n-1) on each direction. For the moment, my testing is in branch test_newzeropoints I have asked Malcolm if the change of behaviour is acceptable. |
Reply from Malcolm:
So the version from Holger is acceptable from the point of view of results. Just need a review now 😄 |
Tests come back with some Warning:
We'll want to remove the calls to |
Removed duplication between wetbulb and dewpoint, created a few more elemental functions that can be tested independently, created a unittesting script. resolves #1