Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QA Report #7

Closed
c4-bot-1 opened this issue Apr 28, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

QA Report #7

c4-bot-1 opened this issue Apr 28, 2024 · 3 comments
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate-11 edited-by-warden satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards upgraded by judge Original issue severity upgraded from QA/Gas by judge

Comments

@c4-bot-1
Copy link
Contributor

See the markdown file with the details of this report here.

@c4-bot-1 c4-bot-1 added bug Something isn't working QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax labels Apr 28, 2024
c4-bot-2 added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 28, 2024
c4-bot-7 added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 28, 2024
c4-bot-6 added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 29, 2024
c4-bot-10 added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 29, 2024
@c4-judge c4-judge removed the QA (Quality Assurance) Assets are not at risk. State handling, function incorrect as to spec, issues with clarity, syntax label May 1, 2024
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

c4-judge commented May 1, 2024

alcueca changed the severity to 2 (Med Risk)

@c4-judge c4-judge added 2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value upgraded by judge Original issue severity upgraded from QA/Gas by judge labels May 1, 2024
@c4-judge c4-judge closed this as completed May 1, 2024
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

c4-judge commented May 1, 2024

alcueca marked the issue as duplicate of #11

@c4-judge c4-judge added the satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards label May 1, 2024
@c4-judge
Copy link
Contributor

c4-judge commented May 1, 2024

alcueca marked the issue as satisfactory

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
2 (Med Risk) Assets not at direct risk, but function/availability of the protocol could be impacted or leak value bug Something isn't working duplicate-11 edited-by-warden satisfactory satisfies C4 submission criteria; eligible for awards upgraded by judge Original issue severity upgraded from QA/Gas by judge
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants