Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

release-22.2: kvstreamer: fix the usage of the range iterator #94100

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 22, 2022

Conversation

blathers-crl[bot]
Copy link

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot commented Dec 21, 2022

Backport 1/1 commits from #94031 on behalf of @yuzefovich.

/cc @cockroachdb/release


Previously, after Seeking the range iterator to the next key in the batch of requests in the streamer we forgot to check the validity of the iterator. In particular, this could lead to a crash of the process if Seek encountered an error for whatever reason. In practice, I've only observed this when running TPCH with high concurrency when GOMEMLIMIT is set.

The bug was introduced in an innocently-looking refactor in 041b104.

Epic: None

Release note (bug fix): CockroachDB could previously crash in rare circumstances when evaluating lookup and index joins. The bug is present since 22.2.0 release. Temporary workaround without upgrading to the release with this fix is changing the value of undocumented cluster setting sql.distsql.use_streamer.enabled to false.


Release justification: bug fix.

Previously, after `Seek`ing the range iterator to the next key in the
batch of requests in the streamer we forgot to check the validity of the
iterator. In particular, this could lead to a crash of the process if
`Seek` encountered an error for whatever reason. In practice, I've only
observed this when running TPCH with high concurrency when GOMEMLIMIT is
set.

The bug was introduced in an innocently-looking refactor in
041b104.

Epic: None

Release note (bug fix): CockroachDB could previously crash in rare
circumstances when evaluating lookup and index joins. The bug is present
since 22.2.0 release. Temporary workaround without upgrading to the
release with this fix is changing the value of undocumented cluster
setting `sql.distsql.use_streamer.enabled` to `false`.
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested a review from a team as a code owner December 21, 2022 20:25
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested a review from DrewKimball December 21, 2022 20:25
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot force-pushed the blathers/backport-release-22.2-94031 branch from 1039d2c to 0fb5be8 Compare December 21, 2022 20:25
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested review from michae2 and yuzefovich December 21, 2022 20:25
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot. labels Dec 21, 2022
@blathers-crl
Copy link
Author

blathers-crl bot commented Dec 21, 2022

Thanks for opening a backport.

Please check the backport criteria before merging:

  • Patches should only be created for serious issues or test-only changes.
  • Patches should not break backwards-compatibility.
  • Patches should change as little code as possible.
  • Patches should not change on-disk formats or node communication protocols.
  • Patches should not add new functionality.
  • Patches must not add, edit, or otherwise modify cluster versions; or add version gates.
If some of the basic criteria cannot be satisfied, ensure that the exceptional criteria are satisfied within.
  • There is a high priority need for the functionality that cannot wait until the next release and is difficult to address in another way.
  • The new functionality is additive-only and only runs for clusters which have specifically “opted in” to it (e.g. by a cluster setting).
  • New code is protected by a conditional check that is trivial to verify and ensures that it only runs for opt-in clusters.
  • The PM and TL on the team that owns the changed code have signed off that the change obeys the above rules.

Add a brief release justification to the body of your PR to justify this backport.

Some other things to consider:

  • What did we do to ensure that a user that doesn’t know & care about this backport, has no idea that it happened?
  • Will this work in a cluster of mixed patch versions? Did we test that?
  • If a user upgrades a patch version, uses this feature, and then downgrades, what happens?

@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Collaborator

@DrewKimball DrewKimball left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 1 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @michae2 and @yuzefovich)

@yuzefovich yuzefovich merged commit f214b7a into release-22.2 Dec 22, 2022
@yuzefovich yuzefovich deleted the blathers/backport-release-22.2-94031 branch December 22, 2022 00:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants