Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

bazel: detect go standard library deprecation errors #87327

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2022

Conversation

healthy-pod
Copy link
Contributor

Previously, staticcheck only raised deprecation errors
from non-stdlib packages because the analysis pass used
by the deprecation analyzer is created by nogo which doesn't
analyze the standard library packages.

This code change patches staticcheck to let it detect deprecation
errors from the standard library and raise them. It also removes two
uses of tls.Config.PreferServerCipherSuites because it's deprecated
since Go 1.18 and is a legacy field that is ignored and has no effect.

Closes #84877

Release justification: Non-production code change
Release note: None

@healthy-pod healthy-pod requested review from a team as code owners September 2, 2022 09:03
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@rickystewart
Copy link
Collaborator

@healthy-pod This may warrant a bug report upstream. It's known that stdlib packages don't always have analysis result and I think this check should still work even in that scenario. Best case scenario we might be able to remove this custom patch in the future.

@healthy-pod
Copy link
Contributor Author

bors r=rickystewart

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Sep 6, 2022

🕐 Waiting for PR status (Github check) to be set, probably by CI. Bors will automatically try to run when all required PR statuses are set.

@knz
Copy link
Contributor

knz commented Sep 6, 2022

This is missing the CLA approval. Need to get that done before the PR can be processed.

@healthy-pod
Copy link
Contributor Author

This is missing the CLA approval. Need to get that done before the PR can be processed.

Right thanks for pointing that out. I merged PRs before though so trying to find out why license/cla was not reported this time.

@knz
Copy link
Contributor

knz commented Sep 6, 2022

Sometimes the webhook doesn't fire. git commit --amend --no-edit and re-push usually tickles it enough.

@healthy-pod
Copy link
Contributor Author

bors r-

Previously, `staticcheck` only raised deprecation errors
from non-stdlib packages because the analysis pass used
by the deprecation analyzer is created by `nogo` which doesn't
analyze the standard library packages.

This code change patches `staticcheck` to let it detect deprecation
errors from the standard library and raise them. It also removes two
uses of `tls.Config.PreferServerCipherSuites` because it's deprecated
since Go 1.18 and is a legacy field that is ignored and has no effect.

Closes cockroachdb#84877

Release justification: Non-production code change
Release note: None
@healthy-pod healthy-pod force-pushed the fix-nogo-stdlib-deprecations branch from 04e574e to 90a0126 Compare September 6, 2022 16:24
@knz
Copy link
Contributor

knz commented Sep 6, 2022

you can issue the bors command now. no need to wait for CI

@healthy-pod
Copy link
Contributor Author

bors r=rickystewart

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Sep 6, 2022

Stopped waiting for PR status (Github check) without running due to duplicate requests to run. You may check Bors to see that this PR is included in a batch by one of the other requests.

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Sep 6, 2022

Build failed (retrying...):

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Sep 6, 2022

Build succeeded:

@craig craig bot merged commit 825e89e into cockroachdb:master Sep 6, 2022
@healthy-pod healthy-pod deleted the fix-nogo-stdlib-deprecations branch September 6, 2022 20:59
healthy-pod pushed a commit to healthy-pod/cockroach that referenced this pull request Dec 1, 2022
In cockroachdb#87327, we patched `staticcheck` to detect deprecated
"objects" from the standard library. This patch ensures that
we also detect deprecated "packages".

Closes cockroachdb#84877

Release note: None
craig bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 2, 2022
92713: sql: fix left semi and left anti virtual lookup joins r=yuzefovich a=yuzefovich

This commit fixes the execution of the left semi and left anti virtual
lookup joins. The bug was that we forgot to project away the looked up
columns (coming from the "right" side) which could then lead to wrong
columns being used higher up the tree. The bug was introduced during
22.1 release cycle where we added the optimizer support for generating
plans that could contain left semi and left anti virtual lookup joins.
This commit fixes that issue as well as the output columns of such joins
(I'm not sure whether there is a user facing impact of having incorrect
"output columns").

Additionally, this commit fixes the execution of these virtual lookup
joins to correctly return the input row only once. Previously, for left
anti joins we'd be producing an output row if there was a match (which
is wrong), and for both left semi and left anti we would emit an output
row every time there was a match (but this should be done only once).
(Although I'm not sure whether it is possible for virtual indexes to
result in multiple looked up rows.)

Also, as a minor simplification this commit makes it so that the output
rows are not added into the row container for left semi and left anti
and the container is not instantiated at all.

Fixes: #91012.
Fixes: #88096.

Release note (bug fix): CockroachDB previously could incorrectly
evaluate queries that performed left semi and left anti "virtual lookup"
joins on tables in `pg_catalog` or `information_schema`. These join types
can be planned when a subquery is used inside of a filter condition. The
bug was introduced in 22.1.0 and is now fixed.

92783: nogo: detect deprecated go standard library packages r=rickystewart a=healthy-pod

In #87327, we patched `staticcheck` to detect deprecated "objects" from the standard library. This patch ensures that we also detect deprecated "packages".

Closes #84877

Release note: None

92859: rowcontainer: address an old TODO r=yuzefovich a=yuzefovich

This commit addresses an old TODO about figuring out why we cannot reuse the same buffer in `diskRowIterator.Row` method. The contract of that method was previously confusing - it says that the call to `Row` invalidates the row returned on the previous call; however, the important piece was missing - that the datums themselves cannot be mutated (this is what we assume elsewhere and perform only the "shallow" copies). This commit clarifies the contract of the method and explicitly explains why we need to allocate fresh byte slices (which is done via `ByteAllocator` to reduce the number of allocations).

Additional context can be found in #43145 which added this copy in the first place. Here is a relevant quote from Alfonso:
```
I think what's going on here is that this type of contract (you may only
reuse the row until the next call) is a bit unclear. `CopyRow`s of
`EncDatum`s are only implemented as shallow copies, so the reference to
this reuse only applies to the `EncDatumRow`, but not to the `encoded`
field, which is what is rewritten in this case. The `encoded` field will
not be copied, so I think the tests are probably failing due to that.
This is unfortunate and there doesn't seem to be a good reason for it.
To implement deep copies, we will have to implement deep copies for
`Datum`s as well.
```
I think we were under the impression that we'd implement the "deep copy" in `CopyRow`, but I highly doubt we'll do so given that we're mostly investing in the columnar infrastructure nowadays, and the current way of performing shallow copying has worked well long enough.

Epic: None

Release note: None

Co-authored-by: Yahor Yuzefovich <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: healthy-pod <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bazel: nogo does not seem to catch all deprecation errors
4 participants