Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kvserver: disable sendWithRangeID call stack #75220

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2022

Conversation

tbg
Copy link
Member

@tbg tbg commented Jan 20, 2022

Sadly, this on longer embeds the RangeID in the stack trace (likely
culprit: Go adopting a register-based calling convention) Instead, you
get garbage values that often are obviously garbage, but this may not
always be true. We want to avoid being misled, so for now remove the
rangeID here and explain when it can come back.

See: https://cockroachlabs.slack.com/archives/G01G8LK77DK/p1641478596004700

Release note: None

@tbg tbg requested a review from a team as a code owner January 20, 2022 16:10
@tbg tbg requested a review from nvanbenschoten January 20, 2022 16:10
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

Sadly, this on longer embeds the RangeID in the stack trace (likely
culprit: Go adopting a register-based calling convention) Instead, you
get garbage values that often are obviously garbage, but this may not
always be true. We want to avoid being misled, so for now remove the
rangeID here and explain when it can come back.

See: https://cockroachlabs.slack.com/archives/G01G8LK77DK/p1641478596004700

Release note: None
@tbg tbg force-pushed the sendWithoutRangeID branch from 833c90e to bd72f75 Compare January 20, 2022 16:11
@tbg
Copy link
Member Author

tbg commented Jan 20, 2022

bors r=knz
TFTR!

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Jan 21, 2022

Build succeeded:

@craig craig bot merged commit 9e22d9d into cockroachdb:master Jan 21, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants