Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rowexec: fix bug where windower was not using fingerprint #49234

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 19, 2020

Conversation

rohany
Copy link
Contributor

@rohany rohany commented May 19, 2020

Release note (bug fix): Fix a bug with use of arrays combined with
window functions causing a query failure.

@rohany rohany requested a review from jordanlewis May 19, 2020 00:08
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

Copy link
Member

@jordanlewis jordanlewis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm: (cc @yuzefovich to see if he has any objection)

Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 1 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @jordanlewis and @rohany)


pkg/sql/logictest/testdata/logic_test/window, line 3810 at r1 (raw file):

1  2  2  2  1  1

# Regression test for windower not using EncDatum.Fingerprint.

nit: Would you mind putting this in the orms logic test please?

Release note (bug fix): Fix a bug with use of arrays combined with
window functions causing a query failure.
Copy link
Member

@yuzefovich yuzefovich left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Reviewed 1 of 2 files at r1, 2 of 2 files at r2.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 0 of 0 LGTMs obtained (and 1 stale) (waiting on @rohany)

@rohany
Copy link
Contributor Author

rohany commented May 19, 2020

TFTRs! Moved it over to orms

bors r+

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented May 19, 2020

Build succeeded

@craig craig bot merged commit c8c8007 into cockroachdb:master May 19, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants