Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

roachtest: reduce rebalance-by-load noise #104885

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 15, 2023

Conversation

kvoli
Copy link
Collaborator

@kvoli kvoli commented Jun 14, 2023

The rebalance-by-load tests assert that the normalized [0,1] CPU utilization of each node is within some threshold of the mean. The threshold was previously 10%, however it is not unexpected that despite replica load being within this threshold, that total node load is not.

The current balancing implementation only concerns itself with replica load.

Bump the tolerance from 10% to 15% to reduce noise.

Additionally, the test did not wait for 3x replication prior to beginning the workload. This is bound to introduce flakes eventually. Wait for 3x replication before beginning.

Resolves: #104854
Resolves: #104386

Release note: None

The rebalance-by-load tests assert that the normalized [0,1] CPU
utilization of each node is within some threshold of the mean. The
threshold was previously 10%, however it is not unexpected that despite
replica load being within this threshold, that total node load is not.

The current balancing implementation only concerns itself with replica
load.

Bump the tolerance from 10% to 15% to reduce noise.

Additionally, the test did not wait for 3x replication prior to
beginning the workload. This is bound to introduce flakes eventually.
Wait for 3x replication before beginning.

Resolves: cockroachdb#104854
Resolves: cockroachdb#104386

Release note: None
@kvoli kvoli requested a review from a team as a code owner June 14, 2023 14:58
@kvoli kvoli self-assigned this Jun 14, 2023
@kvoli kvoli requested review from herkolategan and renatolabs and removed request for a team June 14, 2023 14:58
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@kvoli kvoli added backport-23.1.x Flags PRs that need to be backported to 23.1 backport-22.2.x labels Jun 14, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

@andrewbaptist andrewbaptist left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:lgtm:

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1.
Reviewable status: :shipit: complete! 1 of 0 LGTMs obtained (waiting on @herkolategan, @renatolabs, and @sumeerbhola)

@kvoli
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kvoli commented Jun 14, 2023

bors r+ single on

@kvoli
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kvoli commented Jun 14, 2023

TYFTR!

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Jun 14, 2023

Build failed:

@kvoli
Copy link
Collaborator Author

kvoli commented Jun 15, 2023

Flakes unrelated. Let's retry.

bors r+ single on

@craig
Copy link
Contributor

craig bot commented Jun 15, 2023

Build succeeded:

@craig craig bot merged commit 8d9cbc4 into cockroachdb:master Jun 15, 2023
@blathers-crl
Copy link

blathers-crl bot commented Jun 15, 2023

Encountered an error creating backports. Some common things that can go wrong:

  1. The backport branch might have already existed.
  2. There was a merge conflict.
  3. The backport branch contained merge commits.

You might need to create your backport manually using the backport tool.


error creating merge commit from 1fefe10 to blathers/backport-release-22.2-104885: POST https://api.github.com/repos/cockroachdb/cockroach/merges: 409 Merge conflict []

you may need to manually resolve merge conflicts with the backport tool.

Backport to branch 22.2.x failed. See errors above.


🦉 Hoot! I am a Blathers, a bot for CockroachDB. My owner is dev-inf.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backport-23.1.x Flags PRs that need to be backported to 23.1
Projects
None yet
3 participants