Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: selinux-policy-40.13.5-1.el10.noarch is broken as well #1729

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 18, 2024

Conversation

martinpitt
Copy link
Member

Rewrite this using a case as that's syntactically easier.


See https://artifacts.dev.testing-farm.io/be2e002f-fb32-4cfb-8a55-3f2b2a870dc9/ - I kept the old version as that's still in some RHEL 10 composes.

Rewrite this using a `case` as that's syntactically easier.
Copy link

We were not able to find or create Copr project packit/cockpit-project-cockpit-machines-1729 specified in the config with the following error:

Packit received HTTP 500 Internal Server Error from Copr Service. Check the Copr status page: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/status/stats/, or ask for help in Fedora Build System matrix channel https://matrix.to/#/#buildsys:fedoraproject.org.

Unless the HTTP status code above is >= 500, please check your configuration for:

  1. typos in owner and project name (groups need to be prefixed with @)
  2. whether the project name doesn't contain not allowed characters (only letters, digits, underscores, dashes and dots must be used)
  3. whether the project itself exists (Packit creates projects only in its own namespace)
  4. whether Packit is allowed to build in your Copr project
  5. whether your Copr project/group is not private

@martinpitt
Copy link
Member Author

argh yes, copr is kaputt today. My build in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/cockpit-files/pull-request/10 also hasn't been picked up for many hours.

@martinpitt
Copy link
Member Author

OK, that's better -- now it "only" fails testCreateDownloadAnOS (for a different reason), not all tests any more due to SELinux. So that's at least an improvement. I'll look at that new failure next. It strongly reminds me of #1724, presumably there's a new libvirt or virt-install version which is trickling into development distros now.

@martinpitt martinpitt requested a review from jelly July 18, 2024 10:55
Copy link
Member

@jelly jelly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Blegh, thanks for the workarounds!

@jelly jelly merged commit d6818fb into cockpit-project:main Jul 18, 2024
16 of 17 checks passed
@martinpitt martinpitt deleted the r10-selinux branch July 18, 2024 12:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants