[WIP] Basic loops #840
Closed
[WIP] Basic loops #840
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Moved to #847. I'm in favor of something like this, but I want to have a more holistic design before settling on an implementation. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Not sure how we should implement basic loops in an efficient way. This implementation requires tail-recursion, which was only available when optimizing for speed on my machine. And I guess the lambdas
conditionandbodywon't be inlined which causes unnecessary function call overhead.This PR is only to trigger discussion as it's easily buried a bit in Discord. Ref https://discord.com/channels/888196168067199046/888196168067199049/1084182802104340590