modifications to assessment docs per 06122019 meeting notes #207
Conversation
|
@ultrasaurus please take a look and ensure i include the areas discussed per last wednesday's meeting |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
this is great! Thanks so much for all of your edits. Left a lot of comments, but mostly small things. Would like to hear from @JustinCappos on naming
- security assessment
- project security assessment
- CNCF project security assessment
- etc
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@ultrasaurus Changes made and provided consisetncy in wrapping/breaks & headers/paragraphs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Formatting nit: other pages I looked at did not have leading indent, so let's not modify to add that. I've added a bit to the (new) style guide to cover this: #214
Thanks for iterating on this!
…ecurity into assessment-doc-update
|
@ultrasaurus i believe i've caught everything we discussed |
|
@JustinCappos -- note that for naming, it seems we're going with:
which is good with me -- thanks @TheFoxAtWork for picking something and making the doc consistent |
|
added @JustinCappos as reviewer for visibility, but since this PR contains clarifications to reflect the process we've actually been following, I will go ahead and merge |
modifications to assessment docs per 06122019 meeting notes
Made changes to existing assessment docs per discussion from 06122019 meeting notes. Opened new issue #206, commented on issue #183