Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update pythia fragment for Run3 VBF anomalous coupling samples #3784

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

jdavis36
Copy link
Contributor

Hi Gen Group,

We want to commit this pythia fragment for JHUGen LO VBF with anomalous couplings. I am unfamiliar with the exact defaults recommended for Run3, but we want the following:

  • Gen recommended default pythia tunes for Run3 13.6 TeV
  • SpaceShower/TimeShower fudge factors as written in this fragement. (To match Run2 VBF pythia configs)

Can you check to make sure that this pythia fragment reflects the above bullet points?

Best,
Jeff

@bbilin
Copy link
Collaborator

bbilin commented Oct 22, 2024

@jdavis36 we are fine with the PR, except we want to make clear that dipole recoil scheme is not applicable here for a VBF sample.

Maybe @smrenna has a comment here.

EDIT: The previous requests did not have the Dipole Recoil but global recoil.

@jdavis36
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bbilin Just to be sure, you are talking about non JHUGen samples correct? I think the last JHUGen based VBF samples requested for run 2 should use the global recoil? Unless dipole is now turned on by default, then I would have to specify that we want to turn it off?

@jdavis36
Copy link
Contributor Author

jdavis36 commented Nov 8, 2024

@bbilin Just pinging this again.

@lviliani
Copy link
Contributor

Hello, I think the question is if it's fine to use the global recoil for these VBF samples (as in this fragment). If yes, we can merge this I guess.

@bbilin
Copy link
Collaborator

bbilin commented Dec 12, 2024

any answer?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants