change the naming convention of CaloMETs

[TaiSakuma]

Continuing from #4114, this PR removes "corMetGlobalMuons" from the RECO sequence and the event contents of RECO and AOD. The new name is "caloMetM", which was already added to RECO and AOD at #4114 and included in CMSSW_7_2_0_pre1. This PR also replaces "corMetGlobalMuons" with "caloMetM" in various files.

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @TaiSakuma (Tai Sakuma) for CMSSW_7_2_X.

change the naming convention of CaloMETs

It involves the following packages:

DQM/Physics
DQMOffline/JetMET
Documentation/DataFormats
ElectroWeakAnalysis/WENu
ElectroWeakAnalysis/WMuNu
FWCore/GuiBrowsers
JetMETCorrections/Type1MET
PhysicsTools/PatAlgos
RecoMET/Configuration
RecoMET/METProducers
Validation/RecoMET
Validation/RecoParticleFlow

@Dr15Jones, @StoyanStoynev, @danduggan, @cmsdoxy, @rovere, @monttj, @cmsbuild, @nclopezo, @deguio, @slava77, @vadler, @Degano, @ojeda, @ktf can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@nhanvtran, @wmtan, @wddgit, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
You can sign-off by replying to this message having '+1' in the first line of your reply.
You can reject by replying to this message having '-1' in the first line of your reply.

[cmsbuild]

-1

Tested at: fe485cd
I ran the usual tests and I found errors in the following unit tests:

---> test testJetMETCorrectionsType1MET had ERRORS
---> test runtestPhysicsToolsPatAlgos had ERRORS

you can see the results of the tests here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4709/382/summary.html

[TaiSakuma]

This PR seems to need a few more signatures.

Is it ok to merge this PR?

[TaiSakuma]

Hello. Is it possible to merge this PR, please, unless anyone has further comments?

[ktf]

+1

[ktf]

Looks like core signature comes from FWCore/GuiBrowser. Maybe it should be moved to have an analysis only signature?