-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use dedicated GT in pp ref 2024 relval workflow #46003
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-46003/41781 |
A new Pull Request was created by @mandrenguyen for master. It involves the following packages:
@AdrianoDee, @cmsbuild, @consuegs, @kskovpen, @miquork, @perrotta, @saumyaphor4252, @srimanob, @subirsarkar, @sunilUIET can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test workflow 149.1 |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 64KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+alca |
+pdmv |
@cms-sw/upgrade-l2 please have a look |
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @mandrenguyen, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
pp ref relval was using pp high lumi conditions.
At the moment, those are similar to pp high lumi, but at some point we'll need to update the beam spot.
The PR switches the relval to use the GT set up by AlcaDB for this purpose
PR validation:
compiles. To be tested with 149.1
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Will need a 14_1_X backport