Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use uncorrected H/E for electron energy regressions: 140X #45526

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 23, 2024

Conversation

Sam-Harper
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

This is a bug fix and backport of #45470

Please see that PR for the full details of the bug fix. Summary, the E/gamma energy regression is using the wrong H/E value.

This PR makes it use the uncorrected value. This is the correct value for UL Run2 samples and the upcoming 2024 regression.

This is the wrong value for current Run3 regression but the current variable is also wrong for the Run3 regression so this is just different wrong.

The effect on real electrons, particularly those well measured, should be small. The effect on jets and missmeasured electrons is higher but the value should be comparible physics wise to the old one.

PR validation:

tested as part of:
#45470

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 22, 2024

A new Pull Request was created by @Sam-Harper for CMSSW_14_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • RecoEgamma/EgammaTools (reconstruction)

@cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Prasant1993, @a-kapoor, @afiqaize, @jainshilpi, @lgray, @missirol, @ram1123, @sameasy, @sobhatta, @valsdav, @varuns23 this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @mandrenguyen, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jul 22, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

type bug-fix, egamma

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

backport of #45470

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository
Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-1cdb6f/40527/summary.html
COMMIT: b2497be
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2024-07-22-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/45526/40527/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

+reconstruction
As per #45470 (comment) we plan to merge this into the production release even though it changes reconstruction.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_14_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_14_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @mandrenguyen, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 487bfea into cms-sw:CMSSW_14_0_X Jul 23, 2024
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants