-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use uncorrected H/E for electron energy regressions: 140X #45526
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @Sam-Harper for CMSSW_14_0_X. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
cms-bot internal usage |
please test |
type bug-fix, egamma |
backport of #45470 |
+1 Size: This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+reconstruction |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_14_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_14_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @mandrenguyen, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This is a bug fix and backport of #45470
Please see that PR for the full details of the bug fix. Summary, the E/gamma energy regression is using the wrong H/E value.
This PR makes it use the uncorrected value. This is the correct value for UL Run2 samples and the upcoming 2024 regression.
This is the wrong value for current Run3 regression but the current variable is also wrong for the Run3 regression so this is just different wrong.
The effect on real electrons, particularly those well measured, should be small. The effect on jets and missmeasured electrons is higher but the value should be comparible physics wise to the old one.
PR validation:
tested as part of:
#45470