Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Miscellaneous fixes for TRK POG Data/MC validation tool #45173

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 13, 2024

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Jun 8, 2024

PR description:

Few miscellaneous fixes for the TRK POG data/MC validation tool:

  • 6ca6c26: fix MC KShort analysis sequence
  • 5e9ff21: fix sign of 3D pointing angle variable, make code slightly more readable
  • e5a0fb2: fix axis limits for the trackPhiH ME to avoid using dynamic range which causes histogram merging issues

These were spotted by operating the data/MC validation tool on 2024 data.

PR validation:

cmssw compiles

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Not a backport, will be backported to CMSSW_14_0_X for 2024 data-taking purposes.

Cc: @dbruschi

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 8, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Jun 8, 2024

type bug-fix

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Jun 8, 2024

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 8, 2024

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-45173/40529

  • This PR adds an extra 36KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 8, 2024

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • DQM/TrackingMonitorSource (dqm)

@syuvivida, @rvenditti, @nothingface0, @antoniovagnerini, @tjavaid can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@mtosi, @arossi83, @mmusich, @threus, @VourMa, @VinInn, @JanFSchulte, @jandrea, @idebruyn, @fioriNTU, @sroychow this is something you requested to watch as well.
@sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 8, 2024

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-45173/40530

  • This PR adds an extra 36KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 8, 2024

Pull request #45173 was updated. @tjavaid, @nothingface0, @rvenditti, @syuvivida, @cmsbuild, @antoniovagnerini can you please check and sign again.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Jun 8, 2024

@cmsbuild, please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jun 8, 2024

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7be21b/39798/summary.html
COMMIT: e5a0fb2
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-06-07-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/45173/39798/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 2 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 4 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3445482
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3445459
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 206 log files, 170 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@tjavaid
Copy link

tjavaid commented Jun 13, 2024

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants