-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Phase2 Fast CPE Template Error Fix #44916
Conversation
type bug-fix |
cms-bot internal usage |
@cms-sw/trk-dpg-l2 I would ask for DPG experts opinion on this. |
please test |
Note: just a first round of tests. |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44916/40195
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
d373d0a
to
00b8111
Compare
@emiglior FYI |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44916/40196
|
A new Pull Request was created by @AdrianoDee for master. It involves the following packages:
@mandrenguyen, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2 can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
Thanks @AdrianoDee . |
Sure, done here #44919 |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests RelVals-INPUT Unit TestsI found 1 errors in the following unit tests: ---> test test-das-selected-lumis had ERRORS RelVals-INPUT
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-30174b/39290/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
This PR proposes a trivial fix for the Fast CPE error calculations. As is now only
qBin==0
is taken into account and should not be like this. Additionally with #44813 this ends up in an infinite loop (that is also how I spotted it).Being the original author I honestly don't remember why this was like this in the first place. One of the hypotheses is that the template for Phase 2 pixels was not available at the time of the CUDA port. But I haven't done all the proper archeology.
Fixes for both for Alpaka and CUDA.
Will produce the pixel local reco validation plots and append them here.