-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Propagate downstream the valid state check in PATLeptonTimeLifeInfoProducer #44875
Propagate downstream the valid state check in PATLeptonTimeLifeInfoProducer #44875
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
type tau |
enable nano |
urgent
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44875/40134
|
A new Pull Request was created by @francescobrivio for master. It involves the following packages:
@hqucms, @mandrenguyen, @vlimant, @jfernan2, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-6c3f7a/39179/summary.html Comparison SummaryThere are some workflows for which there are errors in the baseline: Summary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@rappoccio @antoniovilela this is now fully signed, can we merge it? |
+1 |
PR description:
This is an immediate follow up to #44864.
As nicely explained in #44869 (comment) we need a way to propagate downstream the information in case the
closestState.isValid()
check introduced in #44864 fails.In this PR I'm simply moving:
together with the other methods used to fill the
info
object and after the check on the track state validity.PR validation:
Code compiles.
Adding a local cout for
info.hasTrack()
for the track not passing the state check I correctly get:Backport:
Not a backport. This PR will be backported in #44869 together with the backport of #44864