Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Protection of hcalcalib DQM client when hltHcalCalibrationRaw is not found #44545

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2024
Merged

Protection of hcalcalib DQM client when hltHcalCalibrationRaw is not found #44545

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 27, 2024

Conversation

syuvivida
Copy link
Contributor

@syuvivida syuvivida commented Mar 26, 2024

PR description:

In the ECAL laser test runs, run 378496 and 378498, hcalcalib DQM clients crashed with the following error:
----- Begin Fatal Exception 26-Mar-2024 15:41:37 CET----------------------- An exception of category 'ProductNotFound' occurred while [0] Processing Event run: 378496 lumi: 1 event: 5835 stream: 0 [1] Running path 'p' [2] Calling method for module HcalRawToDigi/'hcalDigis' Exception Message: Principal::getByToken: Found zero products matching all criteria Looking for type: FEDRawDataCollection Looking for module label: hltHcalCalibrationRaw Looking for productInstanceName:

Previously in 13_0_X releases, SkipEvent was used to prevent this error. The protection was removed after moving to 14_X. This PR re-introduced the protection using TryToContinue.

PR validation:

A test has been done at the playback using the DQM streamers 378496. We were able to reproduce the crash using the current hcalcalib and removed the crash (skipping events) when using the code of this PR.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 26, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44545/39687

  • This PR adds an extra 20KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @syuvivida for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • DQM/Integration (dqm)

@nothingface0, @rvenditti, @syuvivida, @antoniovagnerini, @tjavaid, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@batinkov, @threus, @francescobrivio this is something you requested to watch as well.
@rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@tjavaid
Copy link

tjavaid commented Mar 26, 2024

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e32c89/38432/summary.html
COMMIT: b06c49f
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-03-26-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/44545/38432/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e32c89/38432/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e32c89/38432/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@tjavaid
Copy link

tjavaid commented Mar 27, 2024

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@antoniovilela
Copy link
Contributor

type bug-fix

@antoniovilela
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 2b64bcd into cms-sw:master Mar 27, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants