Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BaseMVAValueMapProducer configuration and parameter validation #44392

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Mar 15, 2024

Conversation

vlimant
Copy link
Contributor

@vlimant vlimant commented Mar 13, 2024

PR description:

the original implementation of BaseMVAValueMapProducer turns out to be quite cumbersome ; this PR makes it slimmer and hopefully less error-prone

PR validation:

nano matrix

tagging @arizzi

@vlimant
Copy link
Contributor Author

vlimant commented Mar 13, 2024

enable nano

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 13, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44392/39453

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @vlimant for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • PhysicsTools/NanoAOD (xpog)
  • PhysicsTools/PatAlgos (xpog, reconstruction)

@hqucms, @mandrenguyen, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@andrzejnovak, @mmarionncern, @mariadalfonso, @azotz, @Ming-Yan, @hatakeyamak, @emilbols, @nhanvtran, @jdamgov, @schoef, @gouskos, @ahinzmann, @gkasieczka, @rappoccio, @mbluj, @JyothsnaKomaragiri, @gpetruc, @AlexDeMoor, @Senphy, @seemasharmafnal, @AnnikaStein, @jdolen, @demuller this is something you requested to watch as well.
@rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@vlimant
Copy link
Contributor Author

vlimant commented Mar 13, 2024

type muon

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added the muon label Mar 13, 2024
@vlimant
Copy link
Contributor Author

vlimant commented Mar 13, 2024

type jetmet

@vlimant
Copy link
Contributor Author

vlimant commented Mar 13, 2024

type egamma

@vlimant
Copy link
Contributor Author

vlimant commented Mar 13, 2024

please test

@vlimant
Copy link
Contributor Author

vlimant commented Mar 14, 2024

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44392/39474

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #44392 was updated. @mandrenguyen, @jfernan2, @hqucms, @vlimant can you please check and sign again.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-951c12/38131/summary.html
COMMIT: d086c53
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_1_X_2024-03-13-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
Additional Tests: NANO
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/44392/38131/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • No significant changes to the logs found
  • Reco comparison results: 49 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3297383
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 3
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3297360
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 20
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • Checked 202 log files, 165 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

NANO Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 2 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 0 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 15
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 16402
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 16402
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 14 files compared)
  • Checked 45 log files, 25 edm output root files, 15 DQM output files

Nano size comparison Summary:

Sample kb/ev ref kb/ev diff kb/ev ev/s/thd ref ev/s/thd diff rate mem/thd ref mem/thd
2500.0 2.548 2.548 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 5.26 5.10 +3.2% 2.216 2.220
2500.001 2.698 2.698 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 4.65 4.60 +1.2% 2.641 2.658
2500.002 2.638 2.638 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 4.88 4.72 +3.4% 2.643 2.650
2500.01 1.318 1.318 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 9.77 9.42 +3.7% 2.282 2.331
2500.011 1.740 1.740 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 5.27 5.16 +2.2% 2.451 2.534
2500.012 1.581 1.581 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 7.51 7.25 +3.6% 2.353 2.441
2500.1 2.192 2.192 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 5.32 5.30 +0.4% 2.057 2.061
2500.2 2.308 2.308 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 6.05 6.04 +0.3% 1.970 1.968
2500.21 1.181 1.181 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 4.33 4.31 +0.4% 2.266 2.272
2500.211 1.545 1.545 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 3.73 3.71 +0.6% 2.353 2.353
2500.3 2.058 2.058 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 12.64 12.12 +4.3% 1.956 1.959
2500.301 2.631 2.631 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 10.13 9.90 +2.3% 1.949 1.941
2500.31 1.254 1.254 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 19.79 19.43 +1.8% 2.359 2.357
2500.311 1.640 1.640 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 13.57 13.73 -1.2% 2.438 2.433
2500.312 7.159 7.159 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 1.36 1.42 -4.0% 1.685 1.679
2500.313 1.564 1.564 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 5.67 6.86 -17.4% 1.030 1.030
2500.314 1.163 1.163 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 13.66 14.64 -6.7% 2.058 2.201
2500.315 1.758 1.758 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 13.96 13.13 +6.4% 2.321 2.351
2500.316 1.787 1.787 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 13.09 13.18 -0.7% 2.161 2.350
2500.4 2.058 2.058 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 12.42 12.39 +0.3% 1.850 1.965
2500.401 1.824 1.824 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 10.31 9.56 +7.9% 1.812 1.812
2500.402 2.631 2.631 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 9.72 9.81 -0.9% 1.935 1.952
2500.403 2.620 2.620 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 10.33 10.02 +3.1% 1.948 1.950
2500.5 19.575 19.575 0.000 ( +0.0% ) 1.14 1.07 +6.5% 1.342 1.343

@vlimant
Copy link
Contributor Author

vlimant commented Mar 14, 2024

+1

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@antoniovilela
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants