-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BaseMVAValueMapProducer configuration and parameter validation #44392
BaseMVAValueMapProducer configuration and parameter validation #44392
Conversation
enable nano |
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44392/39453
|
A new Pull Request was created by @vlimant for master. It involves the following packages:
@hqucms, @mandrenguyen, @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
type muon |
type jetmet |
type egamma |
please test |
please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-44392/39474
|
Pull request #44392 was updated. @mandrenguyen, @jfernan2, @hqucms, @vlimant can you please check and sign again. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-951c12/38131/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
the original implementation of
BaseMVAValueMapProducer
turns out to be quite cumbersome ; this PR makes it slimmer and hopefully less error-pronePR validation:
nano matrix
tagging @arizzi