Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ECAL - Set correct CC tag labels for ECAL RecHit producer - 133x #43800

Merged

Conversation

thomreis
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

While the ECAL uncalibrated RecHit producer is set up to use the timing calibrations and offsets from the CC labelled records in the GT for Run 3 and beyond (because the cross correlation timing algorithm is used in the time reconstruction), the RecHit producer has until now not picked the calibrations from the record with those labels. This mismatch in conditions used for the two producers is fixed with this PR.
The RecHit producer needs to use the conditions matching the reconstruction algorithm running in the uncalibrated REcHit producer.

In the online DQM the ratio timing is used and the record labels are explicitly set to be empty.

PR validation:

Passes the limited matrix tests.

Backport of #43795

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor Author

type ecal

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor Author

type bugfix

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 26, 2024

A new Pull Request was created by @thomreis (Thomas Reis) for CMSSW_13_3_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • DQM/Integration (dqm)
  • RecoLocalCalo/EcalRecProducers (reconstruction)

@mandrenguyen, @rvenditti, @jfernan2, @tjavaid, @antoniovagnerini, @nothingface0, @syuvivida, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@ReyerBand, @youyingli, @threus, @wang0jin, @argiro, @francescobrivio, @missirol, @apsallid, @thomreis, @rchatter, @batinkov this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Jan 26, 2024

cms-bot internal usage

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor Author

backport of #43795

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9daf46/37071/summary.html
COMMIT: 7777bb4
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_3_X_2024-01-26-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/43800/37071/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

+reconstruction

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for signing this PR @mandrenguyen . Can you please sign the master PR #43795 as well?

@mandrenguyen
Copy link
Contributor

@thomreis It appears to me that I had also signed the PR to the master, but let me know if I'm hallucinating :-)

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor Author

@thomreis It appears to me that I had also signed the PR to the master, but let me know if I'm hallucinating :-)

You did, but it my open tab for that PR had been outdated. Sorry about that.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #43800 was updated. @antoniovagnerini, @cmsbuild, @nothingface0, @rvenditti, @syuvivida, @tjavaid can you please check and sign again.

@thomreis
Copy link
Contributor Author

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-9daf46/37131/summary.html
COMMIT: d32ddc2
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_3_X_2024-01-30-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/43800/37131/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@tjavaid
Copy link

tjavaid commented Feb 1, 2024

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Feb 1, 2024

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_3_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_14_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit c19ea12 into cms-sw:CMSSW_13_3_X Feb 7, 2024
10 checks passed
@thomreis thomreis deleted the cc-timing-config-for-rechits-133x branch February 8, 2024 09:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants