-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
L1Trk reco enabling CheckHistory by default #43690
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
cms-bot internal usage |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43690/38371
|
A new Pull Request was created by @tschuh for master. It involves the following packages:
@epalencia, @aloeliger, @subirsarkar, @srimanob, @cmsbuild can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@BenjaminRS I was pretty jet lagged yesterday and hadn't slept in 48 hours, so I'm not too sure, but I seem to recall this coming up yesterday, were you aware of this PR? |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals RelVals-INPUT RelVals
Expand to see more relval errors ...RelVals-INPUT
Expand to see more relval errors ...
|
Thanks @aloeliger for the notification. I was not aware of the PR. Looks like with this in place it will now throw an exception if the tracking is run on earlier MC. |
please test |
What's the purpose of this re-test?
This PR will never pass integration tests (see e.g. this log). |
@mmusich Apologies, I was looking at the failed test earlier that seemed to have been a temporary issue and just retriggering as I had done for another L1 PR. |
please abort |
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43690/40847 Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
I changed the code to only compare the last two processes. However, correct behavior would be to compare the current (which is the last) process with the one which produced the latest stub collection. I don't know how to identify that process. One option would be to give it as an config parameter. |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43690/40848 |
Pull request #43690 was updated. @aloeliger, @cmsbuild, @epalencia, @srimanob, @subirsarkar can you please check and sign again. |
Milestone for this pull request has been moved to CMSSW_14_2_X. Please open a backport if it should also go in to CMSSW_14_1_X. |
ping (to make bot change milestone) |
Hi, this PR has been on hold for a long time. If people don't want this kind of check in CMSSW by default, could we at least please merge this PR with the "CheckHistory" default setting to "False", so we make available the bug fix to this check, for those people that wish to enable this option? |
Milestone for this pull request has been moved to CMSSW_15_0_X. Please open a backport if it should also go in to CMSSW_14_2_X. |
This PR enables the CheckHistory option by default. Without this check there's a danger of people running CMSSW 14 L1Trk reco on stubs from earlier MC getting nonsense results and not realizing it. This PR got requested by @tomalin