Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enabling the JetCore+DeepCore2.2.1 hybrid with MaxCand=30 (JC30DC) #43339

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 28, 2023

Conversation

bouchamaouihichem
Copy link
Contributor

PR description:

PR validation:

Validation on workflow 11923 (high pT QCD PU) for Tracking performance and 11834 (inclusive TTBAR PU) for timing performance.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43339/37794

  • This PR adds an extra 16KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @bouchamaouihichem for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • RecoTracker/IterativeTracking (reconstruction)

@cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@missirol, @mtosi, @mmusich, @VinInn, @GiacomoSguazzoni, @JanFSchulte, @rovere, @dgulhan, @gpetruc, @ebrondol, @VourMa, @felicepantaleo this is something you requested to watch as well.
@sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4a3e84/35973/summary.html
COMMIT: b2d0b7a
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2023-11-20-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/43339/35973/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

mmusich commented Nov 22, 2023

I think this should be tested with one of the seedingDeepCore-modified workflows (offset number 0.17)

class UpgradeWorkflow_seedingDeepCore(UpgradeWorkflow):

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

test parameters:

  • workflow = 11723.17

…re. Also updating to latest model JC20DC (MaxCand = 20)
@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

please test
With the right wf

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4a3e84/36008/summary.html
COMMIT: b2d0b7a
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2023-11-22-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/43339/36008/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

@bouchamaouihichem could you please confirm if the changes introduced in the jets are as expected? https://tinyurl.com/yp38ebfl
Thanks

@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@
maxPtForLooperReconstruction = 0.0)
jetCoreRegionalStepBarrelTrajectoryBuilder = RecoTracker.CkfPattern.GroupedCkfTrajectoryBuilder_cfi.GroupedCkfTrajectoryBuilderIterativeDefault.clone(
trajectoryFilter = dict(refToPSet_ = 'jetCoreRegionalStepBarrelTrajectoryFilter'),
maxCand = 50,
maxCand = 30,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

from a chat in the TRK mattermost thread, this change is not enough, another update is needed before this PR should be merged.

@bouchamaouihichem
Copy link
Contributor Author

I am currently testing a fix and will update the PR (or make another one) soon

@bouchamaouihichem
Copy link
Contributor Author

Added fix after after testing. Without the DeepCore ProcModifier JetCore will run with MaxCand =50. When the DeepCore ProcModifier is used, JetCore will run with MaxCand = 30 along with DeepCore.

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43339/37911

  • This PR adds an extra 24KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

Pull request #43339 was updated. @cmsbuild, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen can you please check and sign again.

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-4a3e84/36104/summary.html
COMMIT: 6086278
CMSSW: CMSSW_14_0_X_2023-11-27-1100/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/43339/36104/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Nov 28, 2023

Reco comparison results: 1569 differences found in the comparisons

as expected, the changes are only in the .17 (deep core) workflow, where more tracks appear with the jetCore algo ( jetCoreRegionalStep = 11 )

@cms-sw/reconstruction-l2
I think that this PR is OK from tracking POV;
please check this PR from your side.
Thank you.

@jfernan2
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants