Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update the Phase-2 L1 vertex tag in the P2GT producer #43109

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 1, 2023

Conversation

artlbv
Copy link
Contributor

@artlbv artlbv commented Oct 25, 2023

PR description:

The updated collection has a new instance name: L1VerticesEmulation

Corresponds to this PR into the L1 offline repo: cms-l1t-offline#1169

PR validation:

Transparent change, validated in the L1 menu studies for the FastHisto PR.

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

NTR

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-43109/37356

  • This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

A new Pull Request was created by @artlbv (Artur Lobanov) for master.

It involves the following packages:

  • L1Trigger/Phase2L1GT (upgrade, l1)

@aloeliger, @cmsbuild, @epalencia, @AdrianoDee, @srimanob can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@missirol, @Martin-Grunewald this is something you requested to watch as well.
@antoniovilela, @rappoccio, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

@cmsbuild please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3c627b/35403/summary.html
COMMIT: 770de7c
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_3_X_2023-10-24-2300/el8_amd64_gcc12
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week0/cms-sw/cmssw/43109/35403/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3c627b/35403/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-3c627b/35403/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 77 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 26 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3351458
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 1067
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3350369
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • Checked 213 log files, 166 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@epalencia
Copy link
Contributor

+l1

@artlbv
Copy link
Contributor Author

artlbv commented Oct 30, 2023

hi, is there anything else missing to get this merged? thanks!

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @artlbv

Could you please clarify few thins:
(1) Is this kind of bug-fix, or both collections exist?
(2) I don't see any change in PR test. Is this because the P2GT is not used in test workflow, right?

@artlbv
Copy link
Contributor Author

artlbv commented Oct 30, 2023

(1) Is this kind of bug-fix, or both collections exist?

The "L1VerticesEmulation" is the new TrackTrigger vertex collection after some major updates on the GTT.
The "old" collection exists in the 13_1 samples, but should not be reproduced when rerunning the L1 afaik. Maybe @BenjaminRS can precise this?

(2) I don't see any change in PR test. Is this because the P2GT is not used in test workflow, right?

Exactly, the P2GT is not in any standard sequence.

@aloeliger
Copy link
Contributor

@cms-sw/upgrade-l2 While the L1 team is considering the creation of prototype phase 2 workflows, is there any objection to signing on this?

@BenjaminRS
Copy link
Contributor

Hi - yes when running the latest code after #42129 was merged then the new collection name would be L1VerticesEmulation

@srimanob
Copy link
Contributor

srimanob commented Nov 1, 2023

+Upgrade

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Nov 1, 2023

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @sextonkennedy, @rappoccio, @antoniovilela (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@antoniovilela
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit e7bccb3 into cms-sw:master Nov 1, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants