Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a Phase2 HLT tracking DQM monitoring (13.1.X) #42827

Merged

Conversation

mmusich
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich mmusich commented Sep 19, 2023

backport of #42783

PR description:

Minimal set of changes needed to the Tracking @ HLT DQM monitoring sequence for the Phase-2 setup.
This relies on the current naming of the tracking collections for the phase-2 HLT:

  • generalTracks (somewhat copied from offline)
  • hltPhase2PixelTracks (pixel tracks)
  • hltPhase2PixelVertices (pixel vertices)

The latter two were introduced in #42512 but the name change was not percolated to the FEVTDEBUGHLTEventContent, so it becomes necessary to include them in the list of collections to be persisted.
Changes for making the Phase-2 HLT Validation are more extensive and will be addressed with another PR at a later time.

PR validation:

Run successfully runTheMatrix.py -l 20834.0 -t 4 -j 8 (and checked that the HLT tracking plots are full).

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

backport of #42783

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Sep 19, 2023

A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_13_1_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/EventContent (operations)
  • DQM/SiTrackerPhase2 (dqm)
  • DQMOffline/Configuration (dqm)
  • DQMOffline/Trigger (dqm)

@cmsbuild, @rappoccio, @nothingface0, @emanueleusai, @davidlange6, @pmandrik, @syuvivida, @antoniovilela, @tjavaid, @micsucmed, @fabiocos, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@arossi83, @trocino, @sroychow, @Fedespring, @Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @HuguesBrun, @jhgoh, @threus, @mtosi, @fabiocos, @cericeci, @rociovilar this is something you requested to watch as well.
@rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Sep 19, 2023

please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c666ab/34831/summary.html
COMMIT: ecc4d62
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_1_X_2023-09-19-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/42827/34831/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 74 lines to the logs
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 16 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 48
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3187455
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 11
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3187422
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 413379.2159999999 KiB( 47 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 28071.181 KiB HLT/TrackerPhase2ITCluster
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 28052.799 KiB HLT/TrackerPhase2OTCluster
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 12219.999 KiB HLT/Tracking
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 551.987 KiB HLT/Vertexing
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 0.570 KiB HLT/EventInfo
  • Checked 207 log files, 159 edm output root files, 48 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@emanueleusai
Copy link
Member

+1

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

@mmusich is this supposed to be promoted from a draft now?

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Sep 27, 2023

@rappoccio

is this supposed to be promoted from a draft now?

unfortunately not yet. The plots were added but they are all empty: https://tinyurl.com/27qslwcs.
I haven't had yet time to investigate why. I'll come back to this as soon as I can.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Oct 4, 2023

The plots were added but they are all empty: https://tinyurl.com/27qslwcs.

OK, I had some time to look at this and reason why wf 23234.0 plots are empty is rather mundane.
Wf 23234.0 employs geometry D94:

numWFIB.extend([23234.0]) #2026D94

and for that geometry we run the fake menu:

'2026D94' : {
'Geom' : 'Extended2026D94',
'HLTmenu': '@fake2',
'GT' : 'auto:phase2_realistic_T21',
'Era' : 'Phase2C20I13M9',
'ScenToRun' : ['GenSimHLBeamSpot','DigiTrigger','RecoGlobal', 'HARVESTGlobal', 'ALCAPhase2'],
},

so, of course there aren't HLT products available for DQM.
I privately re-run runTheMatrix.py -l 20834.0 -t 4 -j 8 which uses D88 instead:

numWFIB.extend([20834.0]) #2026D88

(which runs the real phase-2 menu)

'2026D88' : {
'Geom' : 'Extended2026D88',
'HLTmenu': '@relval2026',
'GT' : 'auto:phase2_realistic_T21',
'Era' : 'Phase2C17I13M9',
'ScenToRun' : ['GenSimHLBeamSpot','DigiTrigger','RecoGlobal', 'HARVESTGlobal', 'ALCAPhase2'],
},

and I see filled plots. So I think we can go ahead with this PR.

@mmusich mmusich marked this pull request as ready for review October 4, 2023 09:47
@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Oct 4, 2023

test parameters:

  • workflows = 20834.0, 23634.0
  • relvals_opt= -w upgrade

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Oct 4, 2023

@cmsbuild, please test

  • tests are bit stale by now.

@mmusich mmusich changed the title [WIP] Add a Phase2 HLT tracking DQM monitoring (13.1.X) Add a Phase2 HLT tracking DQM monitoring (13.1.X) Oct 4, 2023
@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Oct 4, 2023

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c666ab/35037/summary.html
COMMIT: ecc4d62
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_1_X_2023-10-03-2300/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/42827/35037/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 99 lines to the logs
  • ROOTFileChecks: Some differences in event products or their sizes found
  • Reco comparison results: 10 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3281900
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 5
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3281873
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 482275.75199999986 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 28071.181 KiB HLT/TrackerPhase2ITCluster
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 28052.799 KiB HLT/TrackerPhase2OTCluster
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 12219.999 KiB HLT/Tracking
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 551.987 KiB HLT/Vertexing
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 23234.0,... ): 0.570 KiB HLT/EventInfo
  • Checked 212 log files, 163 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@rovere
Copy link
Contributor

rovere commented Oct 9, 2023

@mmusich do you think it makes sense to integrate this in 13_1? The Review is over, there's P2UG coming, but I'm not sure.

@mmusich
Copy link
Contributor Author

mmusich commented Oct 9, 2023

@rovere

do you think it makes sense to integrate this in 13_1?

well, why not. If there's more PRs that you want to be integrated in the queue this one might enter as well.

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_1_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_3_X is complete. This pull request will be automatically merged.

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit d55a81b into cms-sw:CMSSW_13_1_X Oct 10, 2023
@slava77
Copy link
Contributor

slava77 commented Oct 22, 2023

type tracking

@mmusich mmusich deleted the phase2_hlt_tracking_monitoring_13_1_X branch October 23, 2023 06:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants