-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add mu beamspot constrained pT. Increase mu eta and phi precision to 16 bits [13.0.X] #42762
Conversation
enable nano |
A new Pull Request was created by @vlimant (vlimant) for CMSSW_13_0_X. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @simonepigazzini, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
FYI @namapane |
please test |
Thank you @vlimant ! |
Pull request #42762 was updated. @cmsbuild, @simonepigazzini, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @vlimant can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e30717/34725/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
Pull request #42762 was updated. @cmsbuild, @simonepigazzini, @jfernan2, @mandrenguyen, @vlimant can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-e30717/34735/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
all changes expected |
+1 |
backport of #42646 |
type muon |
+1 Are we skipping the intermediate backports? |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_3_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
I can backport to other branches, just let me know which ones :-) |
@cms-sw/orp-l2 Should we also include this feature in 13_1 and 13_2? |
Yes, in general we would like features implemented in an older cycle also in the intermediate ones. |
+1 |
PR description:
plain backport of #42646