-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[13.2.X] Update PrimaryVertexMonitor
#42479
Conversation
… vs track phi and eta
… vs track phi and eta
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_13_2_X. It involves the following packages:
@nothingface0, @emanueleusai, @cmsbuild, @pmandrik, @syuvivida, @tjavaid, @micsucmed, @rvenditti can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here
|
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-7b4ca8/34105/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_2_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_3_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
type tracking |
backport of #42359
PR description:
The purpose of this PR is to rationalize the code of
PrimaryVertexMonitor
in order to avoid unnecessary repetitions, also I am adding profile plots of the transverse and longitudinal impact parameter errors as a function of track eta and phi.PR validation:
Privately checked
runTheMatrix.py -l 140.063 -t 4 -j 8 --ibeos
output.If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Verbatim backport of #42359 to be used for 2023 Heavy Ion data-taking