-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixing PU for 2023 WFs with more reasonable profile #42295
Conversation
please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-42295/36319
|
A new Pull Request was created by @sunilUIET (sunil bansal) for master. It involves the following packages:
@bbilin, @srimanob, @sunilUIET, @AdrianoDee can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-f5d3ba/33740/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+pdmv |
I assume we should see different in PR test, but not. This is because we don't have 2023 PU sample in the short matrix, Should we use this PR to add |
+Upgrade |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
We should have a following PR, to update the test workflow in the short matrix. I can have it in my next PR. |
+1 |
Hi @sunilUIET I don't see backport of this PR in 13_0/13_1/13_2 yet. Should I include backport to my FastSim backport PR, because it will overwrite this PR anyways? So that we can avoid small PRs. |
@srimanob please |
This PR updates the PU profile of 2023 WFs with a reasonable scenario Run3_Flat55To75_PoissonOOTPU. After merging here, this will be backported to 13_0_X and 13_1_X.