-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove obsolete Scouting Data Format unit tests #41964
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41964/35929
|
A new Pull Request was created by @wddgit (W. David Dagenhart) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones, @makortel can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
There is one thing related to these old tests that bothers me slightly. I am leaning towards just ignoring this, but if someone thinks it is worth investigating I will or maybe someone else should... In the IBs in the ROOT6_X area, the tests removed by this PR are failing. It is only in ROOT6_X build, in all the others it passes. Does anyone understand this? Is it worth worrying about? The log file output is gigantic so it is hard to look at and I don't understand it...
|
please test |
Let's keep @missirol in the loop |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b7ab83/33162/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
hold Until the ROOT problem with the earlier test is understood (#41222 (comment)) |
Pull request has been put on hold by @makortel |
@cmsbuild, please test |
unhold |
The ROOT problem was worked around (see the issue for more details), while waiting for the proper fix. |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-b7ab83/34618/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Comparison differences are related to #39803 |
+core |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @rappoccio, @antoniovilela, @sextonkennedy (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
Remove obsolete Scouting Data Format unit tests
These tests were replaced by newer tests and there is discussion related to that in the PR comments of the PRs adding the new unit tests. See #41913 and #41834.
PR validation:
This only removes obsolete unit tests. There is nothing to test. The newer unit tests that replace them still pass after removal.