-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Utilities/StaticAnalyzers: Remove postprocess-scan-build.py script no longer needed. #41833
Utilities/StaticAnalyzers: Remove postprocess-scan-build.py script no longer needed. #41833
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41833/35727
|
A new Pull Request was created by @gartung (Patrick Gartung) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @smuzaffar, @Dr15Jones, @makortel can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-ce182b/32910/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
Given that this PR only removes a script, is a corresponding change to remove calling the script (only for 13_2_X onwards) needed somewhere? Or is the calling side "smart" enough to call the script only if it exists? |
The calling script checks if the file exists and runs it. |
+core |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
@makortel can this be back-ported to CMSSW_13_1_X? |
I'd be fine with the backport. |
I think a level 1 or level 2 has to issue the backport command. |
Starting with llvm/clang 16, the static analyzer removes bug reports for duplicate locations. The postprocess-scan-build.py script is no longer needed to do this.
addresses #41828