Remove PF candidates with nan for energy [13_0_X]

[mandrenguyen]

backport of #41473

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @mandrenguyen (Matthew Nguyen) for CMSSW_13_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

• RecoParticleFlow/PFProducer (reconstruction)

@cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@missirol, @mmarionncern, @lgray, @seemasharmafnal, @hatakeyamak this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

• Backported from Remove PF candidates with nan for energy #41473

[mandrenguyen]

please test

[perrotta]

urgent

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-783bb0/32267/summary.html
COMMIT: 2fa5275
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-04-30-2300/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/41474/32267/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• You potentially removed 1 lines from the logs
• Reco comparison results: 14 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3554572
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 113
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3554437
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
• Checked 213 log files, 164 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[mandrenguyen]

type pf

[mandrenguyen]

+1

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[perrotta]

+1

• The fix is simple enough, and I don't expect issues from the tests in the master IB
• Since this has been approved by Reco, let also merge in 13_0_X and start building a patch release which includes the fix right after