-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Muon efficiency measurement for GEM #41057
Conversation
-code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41057/34639
Code check has found code style and quality issues which could be resolved by applying following patch(s)
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-41057/34671
|
A new Pull Request was created by @qyguo for master. It involves the following packages:
@emanueleusai, @cmsbuild, @syuvivida, @rvenditti, @micsucmed, @pmandrik can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-651791/31318/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
type gem |
@qyguo to deploy at p5 we need a backport to the 13_0 branch. Once you open the backport we will test it in our machines |
hold
|
Pull request #41057 was updated. @emanueleusai, @cmsbuild, @syuvivida, @rvenditti, @micsucmed, @pmandrik can you please check and sign again. |
please test |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUTThe relvals timed out after 4 hours. Comparison SummarySummary:
|
I'm not sure if this PR could cause the RelVal-INPUT to timeout? |
please test |
No it doesn't: those timeouts are unfortunately appearing rather frequently in tests, and unless the PR touches exactly those workflows there is normally no need to waste resources and run the tests once again |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT RelVals-INPUT
Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (but tests are reportedly failing). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
merge |
Hi all experts, it is the code for Muon efficiency measurement for GEM detector. It is inherited from TnP framework of L. Lunerti (INFN Bologna) following the other sub-detector.
I did the test based on the CMSSW_13_1_0_pre1 framework.
We would like to add this in the next release for P5 and may I ask whether we need to make a backport for this?