-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use anonymous namespace in CandIsolatorFromDeposits #40984
Use anonymous namespace in CandIsolatorFromDeposits #40984
Conversation
This appears to avoid an ASAN error when used with LTO.
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40984/34491
|
A new Pull Request was created by @Dr15Jones (Chris Jones) for master. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
please test |
I tested with step1 of wf 5.1, and it worked there too. Do not understand at all why it fixes it. |
-1 Failed Tests: UnitTests The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Unit TestsI found errors in the following unit tests: ---> test test-das-selected-lumis had ERRORS Comparison SummarySummary:
|
The failing test had the message
which could not have been from this change. |
please test let's see if this can just clear the spurious failure. |
@cmsbuild, please test for CMSSW_13_1_ASAN_X let's see the ASAN as well |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-65f126/31135/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@cms-sw/reconstruction-l2 can you please review this? This should fix the massive ASAN relval errors (please ignore the ASAN unit tests errors #40984 (comment)) |
+reconstruction
|
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
thanks a lot for quick action, I have triggered a 13h00 ASAN IB to test this change |
PR description:
This appears to avoid an ASAN error when used with LTO.
PR validation:
Building and running in the ASAN IB now allows the 1.0 step3 workflow to run.