-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
run3-alca240X Addition of one more Isolated bunch AlCaReco - backport of #40970 to version 13_0_X #40980
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for CMSSW_13_0_X. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild Please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a4da5b/31119/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
hold
|
Pull request has been put on hold by @tvami |
@tvami Please unhold this and approve this to go to 13_0_X |
unhold
|
I'll approve after this is clarified |
@bsunanda HcalCalIsolatedBunchSelector--> this is already in the ZeroBias, and also in the T0 configuration HcalCalIsolatedBunchFilter --> you are trying to add in the Commissioning here (should be followed by a notification to the T0); can this module be replaced by the HcalCalIsolatedBunchSelector ? |
I can sign this, but as mentioned by Maria
it needs to be propagated to the T0 config, it's not read from CMSSW directly It would be nice if the questions under #40980 (comment) would be clarified |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
@bsunanda before merging also this backport PR could you please answer #40980 (comment) (i.e. #40980 (comment))? |
backport of #40970 |
The main difference is one used zero bias and the other needs jet trigger to ensure enough energy in HCAL |
+1 |
I requested it to be added here |
PR description:
Addition of one more Isolated bunch AlCaReco - backport of #40970 to version 13_0_X
PR validation:
Use the runTheMatrix test workflows
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Backported version