Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

run3-alca240X Addition of one more Isolated bunch AlCaReco - backport of #40970 to version 13_0_X #40980

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2023

Conversation

bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda bsunanda commented Mar 7, 2023

PR description:

Addition of one more Isolated bunch AlCaReco - backport of #40970 to version 13_0_X

PR validation:

Use the runTheMatrix test workflows

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Backported version

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 7, 2023

A new Pull Request was created by @bsunanda (Sunanda Banerjee) for CMSSW_13_0_X.

It involves the following packages:

  • Configuration/AlCa (alca)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@Martin-Grunewald, @missirol, @mmusich, @fabiocos, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

bsunanda commented Mar 7, 2023

@cmsbuild Please test

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 7, 2023

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-a4da5b/31119/summary.html
COMMIT: d4250ff
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2023-03-06-2300/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/40980/31119/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

Comparison Summary

Summary:

  • You potentially added 11 lines to the logs
  • Reco comparison results: 46 differences found in the comparisons
  • DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
  • DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3557934
  • DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 117
  • DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 1
  • DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3557794
  • DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
  • DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
  • DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.016 KiB( 48 files compared)
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1000.0 ): 0.008 KiB MessageLogger/Errors
  • DQMHistoSizes: changed ( 1000.0 ): 0.008 KiB MessageLogger/Warnings
  • Checked 213 log files, 164 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
  • TriggerResults: no differences found

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Mar 7, 2023

hold

  • I have comments in the master PR

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

cmsbuild commented Mar 7, 2023

Pull request has been put on hold by @tvami
They need to issue an unhold command to remove the hold state or L1 can unhold it for all

@cmsbuild cmsbuild added the hold label Mar 7, 2023
@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tvami Please unhold this and approve this to go to 13_0_X

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Mar 14, 2023

unhold

  • but there is some mismatch between what Maria told me is needed and the content of this PR, I wrote to her in Mattermost

@cmsbuild cmsbuild removed the hold label Mar 14, 2023
@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Mar 14, 2023

I wrote to her in Mattermost

I'll approve after this is clarified

@mariadalfonso
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda
can you clarify what's the difference between the

HcalCalIsolatedBunchSelector--> this is already in the ZeroBias, and also in the T0 configuration
https://github.com/dmwm/T0/blob/master/etc/ProdOfflineConfiguration.py#L1169

HcalCalIsolatedBunchFilter --> you are trying to add in the Commissioning here (should be followed by a notification to the T0); can this module be replaced by the HcalCalIsolatedBunchSelector ?

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Mar 20, 2023

I can sign this, but as mentioned by Maria

should be followed by a notification to the T0

it needs to be propagated to the T0 config, it's not read from CMSSW directly

It would be nice if the questions under #40980 (comment) would be clarified

@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Mar 20, 2023

@cmsbuild
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_13_0_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_1_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

@bsunanda before merging also this backport PR could you please answer #40980 (comment) (i.e. #40980 (comment))?

@perrotta
Copy link
Contributor

backport of #40970

@bsunanda
Copy link
Contributor Author

The main difference is one used zero bias and the other needs jet trigger to ensure enough energy in HCAL

@rappoccio
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@cmsbuild cmsbuild merged commit 97c7c11 into cms-sw:CMSSW_13_0_X Mar 21, 2023
@tvami
Copy link
Contributor

tvami commented Mar 21, 2023

it needs to be propagated to the T0 config, it's not read from CMSSW directly

I requested it to be added here
https://cms-talk.web.cern.ch/t/add-hcalcalisolatedbunchfilter-to-commissioning-pd-for-900-gev-collisions/21685

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants