-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Adding a check on the BS transverse widths in OnlineBeamSpotESProducer #40744
Adding a check on the BS transverse widths in OnlineBeamSpotESProducer #40744
Conversation
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40744/34154
|
A new Pull Request was created by @dzuolo (Davide Zuolo) for master. It involves the following packages:
@malbouis, @yuanchao, @ChrisMisan, @clacaputo, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @tvami, @mandrenguyen, @francescobrivio can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
@cmsbuild please test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just a very picky comment...
return bs1; | ||
} else if (bs2->sigmaZ() >= bs1->sigmaZ() && bs2->beamType() == 2) { | ||
} else if (bs2->sigmaZ() >= bs1->sigmaZ() && isGoodBS(bs2)) { | ||
return bs2; | ||
} else { | ||
edm::LogInfo("OnlineBeamSpotESProducer") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the log message that comes after this line could be updated to reflect the change in the logic.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ciao Marco. I changed the log message in "1ec86e9"
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-148e6f/30581/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1
|
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40744/34159
|
@cmsbuild , please test |
+code-checks Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40744/34226
|
Pull request #40744 was updated. @malbouis, @yuanchao, @ChrisMisan, @clacaputo, @saumyaphor4252, @tvami, @mandrenguyen, @francescobrivio can you please check and sign again. |
-1 Failed Tests: RelVals-INPUT The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: RelVals-INPUTThe relvals timed out after 4 hours. Comparison SummarySummary:
|
@cmsbuild , please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-148e6f/30692/summary.html The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:
You can see more details here: Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+1 |
+reconstruction |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
This PR adds a check on the BeamSpot transverse widths in OnlineBeamSpotESProducer. The producer checks the BS Fit produced by the two DQM clients and performs an arbitration. We are now adding a new condition (transverse widths larger than a certain threshold) to prevent the upload of payloads containing the results of fit that converged with unphysical values.
PR validation:
Code compiles.
The following commands have been run
scram b code-format
scram b code-checks
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Since the code runs online we propose not to have backports.