-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[12.5.X] Option to make track covariance Pos-def in packedcandidate #40555
[12.5.X] Option to make track covariance Pos-def in packedcandidate #40555
Conversation
type tracking |
A new Pull Request was created by @mmusich (Marco Musich) for CMSSW_12_5_X. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @mandrenguyen, @clacaputo, @swertz, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
backport of #39599 |
@cmsbuild, please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-718e3e/30057/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
|
+reconstruction
|
@cms-sw/xpog-l2 do you have any objection to signing this PR and the other backports? They are useful for analysis purposes and as far as I can tell do not break any existing workflow. |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_5_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
+1 |
PR description:
As reported in BPH https://indico.cern.ch/event/1155820/contributions/4853223/ the packing scheme of the track covariance in MINIAOD introduces the possibility for the covariance matrix to not be positive-definite, with implications to vertex refitting.
The PR adds a new method to PackedCanidate responsible for returning a reference to a pseudoTrack with positive defined covariance matrix.
PR validation:
A simple analyser reading packed candidate was run retrieving the pseudoPosDefTrack to check that the determinant is getting positive.
If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:
Backport of #39599 for analysis of 2022 HI prompt data.