Move files from CalibTracker/SiStripDCS to cms-data

[tvami]

PR description:

I came across this webpage
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/cgi-bin/newQA.py?arch=el8_amd64_gcc10&release=CMSSW_13_0_X_2022-12-14-2300
which shows that
https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/tree/master/CalibTracker/SiStripDCS/data
this is the 6 biggest directory in CMSSW. The PR moves the files out of CMSSW to cms-data

PR validation:

O2O tests to be performed

If this PR is a backport please specify the original PR and why you need to backport that PR. If this PR will be backported please specify to which release cycle the backport is meant for:

Not a backport, no backport needed

[tvami]

test parameters:

• pull_request = move files from CalibTracker/SiStripDCS cms-data/CalibTracker-SiStripDCS#2

[cmsbuild]

+code-checks

Logs: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/code-checks/cms-sw-PR-40330/33415

• This PR adds an extra 12KB to repository

[cmsbuild]

A new Pull Request was created by @tvami (Tamas Vami) for master.

It involves the following packages:

• CalibTracker/SiStripDCS (alca)

@malbouis, @yuanchao, @cmsbuild, @saumyaphor4252, @francescobrivio, @ChrisMisan, @tvami can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks.
@echabert, @mmusich, @robervalwalsh, @gbenelli, @tocheng this is something you requested to watch as well.
@perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio you are the release manager for this.

cms-bot commands are listed here

[tvami]

@cmsbuild , please test

[mmusich]

test parameters:

• pull_request = move files from CalibTracker/SiStripDCS cms-data/CalibTracker-SiStripDCS#2
• addpkg = CondTools/SiStrip, OnlineDB/SiStripO2O

[tvami]

test parameters:

• pull_request = move files from CalibTracker/SiStripDCS cms-data/CalibTracker-SiStripDCS#2
• addpkg = CondTools/SiStrip, OnlineDB/SiStripO2O

[tvami]

@cmsbuild , please abort

[tvami]

@cmsbuild , please test

[cmsbuild]

+1

Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c5a778/29640/summary.html
COMMIT: 8b295ea
CMSSW: CMSSW_13_0_X_2022-12-15-1100/el8_amd64_gcc11
User test area: For local testing, you can use /cvmfs/cms-ci.cern.ch/week1/cms-sw/cmssw/40330/29640/install.sh to create a dev area with all the needed externals and cmssw changes.

The following merge commits were also included on top of IB + this PR after doing git cms-merge-topic:

• @mmusich Add basic SiStripApproximateCluster Monitoring #40295
• @mmusich [TkAl] Fix EoP Validation plotting macros #40182
• @saumyaphor4252 Update Run3 offline and offline_relval GTs #40318
• @sunilUIET fine tune LS to be run for data WFs #40261
• @civanch Geant4 physics config for 11.1 #40313
• @smuzaffar Typo: Fix the correct object to Clone #40317
• @iatakisi adding new per lumi plots to Jetmet DQM #40305
• @bsunanda Phase2-hgx333B Fix issues of wrong DetID assignment for V17 geometry of HGCal #40281
• @cms-sw Update git to 2.38.1 cmsdist#8206
• @aandvalenzuela Update zstd to latest version 1.5.2 cmsdist#8221
• @fwyzard Update hwloc to version 2.9.0 cmsdist#8231
• @fwyzard Update oneTBB to version v2021.8.0-rc1 cmsdist#8232
• @cms-sw [madgraph5amcatnlo] Do not package HEPTools/collier build area cmsdist#8229

You can see more details here:
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c5a778/29640/git-recent-commits.json
https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-c5a778/29640/git-merge-result

Comparison Summary

Summary:

• No significant changes to the logs found
• Reco comparison results: 156 differences found in the comparisons
• DQMHistoTests: Total files compared: 49
• DQMHistoTests: Total histograms compared: 3557521
• DQMHistoTests: Total failures: 74
• DQMHistoTests: Total nulls: 0
• DQMHistoTests: Total successes: 3557425
• DQMHistoTests: Total skipped: 22
• DQMHistoTests: Total Missing objects: 0
• DQMHistoSizes: Histogram memory added: 0.0 KiB( 48 files compared)
• Checked 211 log files, 162 edm output root files, 49 DQM output files
• TriggerResults: no differences found

[tvami]

+alca

• unit test testing O2O passed

[cmsbuild]

This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next master IBs (tests are also fine). This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2)

[perrotta]

+1