-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[12_6_X] TriggerObjectTableProducer configuration and bug fixes #40173
Conversation
A new Pull Request was created by @vlimant (vlimant) for CMSSW_12_6_X. It involves the following packages:
@cmsbuild, @swertz, @vlimant can you please review it and eventually sign? Thanks. cms-bot commands are listed here |
enable nano |
please test |
+1 Summary: https://cmssdt.cern.ch/SDT/jenkins-artifacts/pull-request-integration/PR-781a07/29323/summary.html Comparison SummarySummary:
NANO Comparison SummarySummary:
Nano size comparison Summary:
|
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next CMSSW_12_6_X IBs (tests are also fine) and once validation in the development release cycle CMSSW_13_0_X is complete. This pull request will now be reviewed by the release team before it's merged. @perrotta, @dpiparo, @rappoccio (and backports should be raised in the release meeting by the corresponding L2) |
Sorry, I think I'm losing track here. Didn't we decide NOT to have a remini / renano in 12_6? |
we would still want this, in particular the bug fix part on matching to be in 12.6 to make it "usable for something" |
I imagine that the much larger number of TriggerObject selected enters the "bug fixes" part of this PR: Can you please confirm @vlimant ? |
yes, getting more photon trigger objects is what we want to fix here (among other things) |
+1 |
PR description:
this is a back port of #40145, as most changes there are actually relevant for a 12.6 nano
PR validation:
all done in #40145